Airbus is cheep and Boeing is quality. • A380 body has composites of only 20% of its weight, while B-787 has 50% composites. This video is about the Airbus A380 vs Boeing 787. In fact, many of the most efficient planes of today are the smallest ones. Read the numbers as ballpark figures. However I will be comparing Hub and Spoke vs Point to Point that these two aircraft from Airbus and Boeing are built for. Ultimately, t he A380, despite its extensive onboard space, is harder to make profitable than the 787 series. • Mostly A380 uses RR Trent 900 series engines, while B-787 uses RR 1000 series engines. According to SeatGuru, on an Etihad Dreamliner 787-9, there are eight bathrooms for 231 passengers, meaning about 28 people share one lavatory. A380 Passenger Experience Cons. ... To compete directly with the A380, Boeing’s 747-8 uses fuel-efficient engines like the 787 to carry 450 passengers. With all the latest technology, both the Airbus A380 & the latest Boeing 737NG or MAX are very fuel efficient. A380 Passenger Experience Pros. The Airbus A380 is the largest passenger carrier which has a seating capacity of 555 in a standard configuration. On board bar (Emirates, Etihad, Qatar). • A380-800 is a double deck, single aisle aircraft while Boeing 787 is a single aisle, twin aisle aircraft. • Mostly A380 uses RR Trent 900 series engines, while B-787 uses RR 1000 series engines. However, if Norwegian was given the chance to permanently use an A380 in its fleet, would it? ← What is the Flight Shaming Movement? The introduction of new supersonic aircraft, which are expected to have fuel efficiencies around 7 pax-km/L, could reverse Virgin Atlantic’s efficiency … Both aircraft have a place in the world. Airbus A380 - Singapore Airlines Boeing 787 Dreamliner - ANA All Nippon Airways . Even the aircraft is larger than most of the aircrafts and the cabin noise level is 50% lower; also, it has lower emissions than the aircrafts of the same class (ex. 747 is more fuel efficient, whilst the 747 has nothing on the 787 or A350 in terms of fuel efficiency, the 747 is more fuel efficient than the A380. the A380 is a competitor to the 747, the 787 replaces the 767. Want to learn how to identify these aircraft in less than 5 seconds? @media (max-width: 1171px) { .sidead300 { margin-left: -20px; } } As with the other A350 XWB Family members, Airbus’ A350-1000 brings together the very latest in aerodynamics, design and advanced technologies for a 25% step change in fuel efficiency compared to its current long-range competitor. • A380 is produced with a freight variant, while B-787 only produced as passenger aircrafts. The A380 is designed for long-range hub to hub flights, whilst the 787 series is perfect for more bespoke direct routes away from hubs. Airbus A350 versus Boeing 787: differences and many similarities. The A380 has a state of the art Fly-by-wire flight control system, and it is the first commercial aircraft to use Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) which is an advanced military fighter jet avionics system developed by Thales Group used in F-22 and Dassault Rafale. The Airbus A380 entered commercial service just 11 years ago and can only be accommodated at about a dozen airports worldwide due to its size. This graph keeps on giving. Whisper quiet; Movements feel very stable. And are in the same range as the old Lockheed Constellation aircraft of the 1950s. To compete directly with the A380, Boeing’s 747-8 uses fuel-efficient engines like the 787 to carry 450 passengers. But the 787 has been built with fuel efficiency in mind and it shows when comparing final numbers. However, in terms of the comparison to the larger 787-10, the A380 appears, on paper, to be the more flexible aircraft on account of its longer range. link Crudely, this gives a fuel consumption of 0.0316 litres/passenger km. Just as some cars are more fuel efficient than others, there's a big spread in fuel economy among airlines. For the GEnx, GE advertises on their website: Up to 15% improved fuel efficiency compared to GE’s CF6 engine. So whilst the A380 might have way more fuel onboard (it can carry 85,472 gallons compared to 52,300 gallons on the 777X), the A380 needs it because the plane is nowhere near as efficient as the 777X, costing the operator far more money in the long run. But how exactly does the fuel consumption figures of the 787 compare to a 777? ( Log Out /  But can its fuel efficiency and range help it defeat its rival over the long haul? Airbus A380 was introduced to commercial aviation with Singapore Airlines in October 2007, and the Boeing 787 made its first commercial flight in October 2011 with all Nippon Airlines. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. Fly-by-wire spoilers and outboard ailerons, spearheaded by the 787 Dreamliner, are thought to save weight. BY AirKevin - Wed Sep 12, … On a seat map for an Emirates A380 configured with 14 first-class suites, 76 business seats and 427 economy tickets, there are 17 bathrooms, an average of one for every 30 passengers. All three planes offer a very similar experience from a passenger’s perspective, which far exceeds the one offered onboard older, more conventional aircraft types. Fuel consumption numbers depend upon a lot of factors including flight takeoff weight, flight time, cruising altitude and the like. This video is about the Airbus A380 vs Boeing 787. Airbus A380 Vs Boeing 787 Hub And Spoke Vs Point To Point Youtube Airbus A380 Vs Boeing Dreamliner Telegraph Air Bus Versus Boeing Technology For Leadership Boeing 787 Etihad Airways Boeing 787 9 Dreamliner Airbus A380 861 A6 Flickr Competition Between Airbus And Boeing Wikipedia Boeing 787 Dreamliner And Airbus A380 Comparison Airbus V Boeing On Wide Bodies Leeham News … This was the crux of the Airbus vs Boeing debate. I would say the 787 is much more efficient than the airbus offerings, and with sky high fuel prices that could give Boeing the competitive edge. The Airbus A350 XWB is a family of long-range, wide-body airliners developed by Airbus.The first A350 design proposed by Airbus in 2004, in response to the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, would have been a development of the A330 with composite wings and new engines. The new, and larger, Airbus A380 wing design ensured future versions of the aircraft could handle a total weight of up to 750 tons. Size Matters For Aircraft Fuel Efficiency Just Not In The Way Airbus A350 Is The Xtra Making The Difference Airbus Se Adr Wide Body Battle Boeing 787 10 Or Airbus A350 900 The Boeing Boeing How The 777x Will Beat The Brand New Airbus A350 Part 1 Sky High Fuel Costs Are Excellent News For Boeing And Airbus Boeing 787 Vs Airbus A350 Modern Airliners Boeing 787 10 Range Vs A350 900 … ( Log Out /  The extra efficiency for the 787-8 comes not only from the new engines, but by also being able to fly faster. 737 vs A319, 320, 321 or 787 vs A330 Neo, 747 Intercontinental vs A380 or 777 and 777X vs A350. And how do the […] Airbus states a fuel rate consumption of their A380 at less than 3 L/100 km per passenger (78 passenger-miles per US gallon). Airbus claims its fuel efficiency, control system and sound-reduction technology also make it the most advanced airliner ever built. The new, and larger, Airbus A380 wing design ensured future versions of the aircraft could handle a total weight of up to 750 tons. ... Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner and the A380 superjumbo from Airbus – the Max was something else: a … The European plane maker says the A380 burns 2 percent less fuel per seat than the 747-8. In fact, the mid-sized 787-9 even outranks the A380. • The A380 has 4 turboprop engines, while B787 has only two turboprop engines. It is 20% more fuel efficient than aircraft of the same class (ex. The Airbus A380 and the Boeing 787 Dreamliner are the newest commercial aircrafts designed and built by Airbus (EU) and Boeing (USA). Note: The below numbers are indicative. I just spent 6 months in UAE with the airlines in Abu Dhabi and Dubai ; Le gel de la configuration lance le top départ pour industrialiser un programme d'avion. But Boeing responded with their Boeing -787 Dreamliner, which is smaller than the A380 but highly efficient and profitable for airliners. The Airbus A380 also has a new wing design (at launch), which uses aluminum alloys for wings and fuselage, and composite materials for the middle wing box, which reduces the overall weight of the aircraft. The A350 is just ramping up production this year, while the 787 has been in production about 5 years now. The A350-900 is the cornerstone member of Airbus’ all-new A350 XWB Family, which is shaping the future air travel. Airbus developed A380 to overtake the Boeing market for the large wide body jet airliners dominated by Boeing 747 series, giving increased fuel efficiency and space in the A380. This graph keeps on giving. Difference Between Airbus A380 and Boeing 747, Difference Between Helicopter and Chopper, Difference Between Coronavirus and Cold Symptoms, Difference Between Coronavirus and Influenza, Difference Between Coronavirus and Covid 19, Difference Between Kernel and Operating System, Difference Between Circuit Switching and Packet Switching, Difference Between Gravimetric and Titrimetric Analysis, Difference Between Orthoboric Acid and Metaboric Acid, Difference Between Regeneration and Fibrosis, Difference Between Culture and Media in Microbiology, Difference Between Oxirane Glycidyl and Epoxy Groups, Difference Between Filgrastim and Lenograstim. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. When Airbus and Boeing go at each other, we’re skeptical of the the information provide for the obvious reasons. Airbus A380 vs. Boeing 787. A Place for the Aviation Enthusiast in You. And this isn’t just by a slim margin, this is by a lot (at least in aviation terms anyway!) • The A380 can take off with more weight than the B-787, while B787 has higher fuel efficiency. Dense seating in economy. Fuel Flow/Consumption 787-8 Vs. A330-200 - posted in New Players and Questions: Hi all, So my airline in R6 recently started getting rid of the A330-200s and replacing them with the 787-8. 1, 500 aluminum sheets and 40,000 – 50,000 fasteners give 80% reduction in fasteners), resulting in 30% reduction, in maintenance costs. Lufthansa, which has ordered both the A380 and 747-8, concludes the A380 burns less fuel per 100 passenger kilometers, though the figure is 3% lower on a litre-per-passenger kilometer basis. In 2018, some of Norweigan’s Boeing 787 Dreamliners were grounded due to engine issues. • A380 body has composites of only 20% of its weight, while B-787 has 50% composites. Crucially, however, it also built the Dreamliner with modern, environmental factors such as fuel efficiency in mind. One significant advancement of the design is the reduction in the part count (for ex. First, a grand total of just 6 A350 XWBs have been built. 9 List of Abbreviations Clb Climb Cr Cruise Des Descend DOW Dry Operation Weight Ldg Landing Loi Loiter LTO Landing – Take-Off Cycle MFW Maximum Fuel Weight MTOW Maximum Take Off Weight MZFW Maximum Zero Fuel Weight Res Reserve To Take-Off . improvements are linked to the increased use of more fuel-efficient aircraft— the Boeing 787-9 for Virgin Atlantic and Boeing 777-300ER for Aeroflot. The A350 and B787 Dreamliner are the world’s most advanced airplanes, produced respectively by Airbus (Europe) and Boeing (USA). At a transatlantic distance, a 525-seat Airbus A380 has an efficiency of 74 miles per gallon (mpg) per passenger, while the brand-new 168-seat Boeing 737 MAX 8 reaches 110 mpg per passenger. 10 List of Definitions Breguet Louis Charles … The below table provides the numbers for you! You have a small efficient 787-8 that can do thin routes, you have the 787-10 that has the best CASM for thick medium haul routes. Cabin pressure not quite as good, compared to 787, 350. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Copyright © 2010-2018 Difference Between. Enter your email address to follow us and receive notifications of new posts by email. Head over to our AIKA Birdspot series here. Lufthansa, which has ordered both the A380 and 747-8, concludes the A380 burns less fuel per 100 passenger kilometers, though the figure is 3% lower on a litre-per-passenger kilometer basis. Did physical size matter? A 25 per cent improvement in fuel efficiency and a 25 per cent lower seat-mile cost compared to current aluminium long-range competitors, such as the B777. However, at the same time, the A380’s size also means that it is less flexible in the sense of being able to serve fewer airports. The latter was the first of the two companies to introduce the concept of a revolutionary new and fuel-efficient plane. 777X would be near the 787 on this graph as it uses much of the same technology. The Airbus A380 entered commercial service just 11 years ago and can only be accommodated at about a dozen airports worldwide due to its size. The longest and newest 787 Dreamliner, the 787-10, will fly 330 passengers up to 6,430 nautical miles (11,910 km) -- or more than 90 percent of twin-aisle routes -- with unprecedented efficiency: 25 percent better fuel and emissions than the airplanes it will replace and 10 percent better than the best on offer by … Boeing's 737 Max wooed airlines with its cost-saving fuel economy. Re: A380 vs B777 Autor: M.P. This is the age of fuel efficient aircraft. As such, this is one of the major reasons why airlines are looking to retire the type with increasing haste despite … This video is about the A330neo vs 787 Dreamliner. However I will be comparing Hub and Spoke vs Point to Point that these two aircraft from Airbus and Boeing are built for. Carbon Emissions Per Passenger Decrease More Than 50% Since 1990 →, Why Doesn't The Boeing 777 Have Four Engines Like The A340? Compare the Difference Between Similar Terms. The 787s and A350s of the world are setting benchmarks in terms of being less fuel dependent while not compromising on the flight experience. looking at official statistics from both Boeing’s and Airbus’s websites Cool mood lighting. The European plane maker says the A380 burns 2 percent less fuel per seat than the 747-8. From that Leeham link, none of the engines are 10% better, and my recollection of the LH sustainability reports had the A350 being their most efficient long haul aircraft, … • The A380 has 4 turboprop engines, while B787 has only two turboprop engines. Fuel remains one of the leading operating cost heads for an airline, and thus controlling fuel costs can lead to significant bottom line improvements. The Airbus A330neo is Airbus’s response to the popular Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Looking at the likely number of passengers, the range and the fuel capacity, the fuel consumption figures for the A380, Boeing 787, 777, and 747 very comparable. 3 Examination on Fuel vs Range Diagrams ... Q Fuel Mass Flow η p Efficiency Propeller . The answer as to why companies seem to be favoring the 787 over the A350 is in several parts, none having very much to do with efficiency. Find out which three major airlines are the biggest gas guzzlers. The 787 family reduces fuel use and CO2 emissions by 20-30% and has a 60% smaller noise footprint than the models they replace. Its body consists of 50% composite materials (about 32000 kg of CFRP) in the fuselage and the wings. Publicly available information on the Boeing 787 link show the typical number of seats is 280, the fuel capacity is 138,700 litres link and a range of 15,700 km. All rights reserved. Innovations and efficiency. Airbus A350 versus Boeing 787: differences and many similarities. This jetliner accommodates between 300 and 350 passengers in a standard three-class configuration and its state-of-the-art comfort and amenities ensure that everyone on-board enjoys a … Coming from Engineering cum Human Resource Development background, has over 10 years experience in content developmet and management. There's a reason airlines around the world are no longer buying very large aircraft like the 747 and A380. Airbus A380 vs. Boeing 787 Revisited. How can airlines tackle it? If you spend less time in the air, the 7% fuel efficiency is increased further. The A380's fuel consumption isn't that out of line with similar aircraft of the same ... would use more fuel per passenger over that leg than does say a 737 or A320, despite being more fuel efficient at cruise altitude (if it can even reach its optimal cruise altitude over that distance). A380 Vs A350 Vs B787 All three planes offer a very similar experience from a passenger’s perspective, which far exceeds the one offered onboard older, more conventional aircraft types. Or an A380? Both the Dreamliner and A350 have far quieter cabins than conventional aircraft. 777X would be near the 787 on this graph as it uses much of the same technology. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy: Legal. • The A380 can take off with more weight than the B-787, while B787 has higher fuel efficiency. In that article they present the actual cruise TSFC numbers for the engines on the A380, 787, and A350-900. Source: Lufthansa artwork. This meant the US$280m A380 would achieve optimum cost-efficiency carrying closer to … A head-to-head comparison between the two aircraft can give airlines millions of dollars in savings just by choosing a 787-9 over the A380 (though an A380 has almost double the number of seats compared to the 787). The competition between Airbus and Boeing has been characterised as a duopoly in the large jet airliner market since the 1990s. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. the A380 is a competitor to the 747, the 787 replaces the 767. The Airbus A380 also has a new wing design (at launch), which uses aluminum alloys for wings and fuselage, and composite materials for the middle wing box, which reduces the overall weight of the aircraft. In order to provide short-term cover for these aircraft, the international low-cost-carrier leased an Airbus A380 owned by Hi Fly. A head-to … A380 Vs A350 Vs B787. - Elite News. Boeing 787 Dreamliner - the claim is one of unmatched fuel efficiency compared with similar sized current planes, brought about by increased use of composite materials and better engine efficiency. What do you think? In designing Boeing 787 Dreamliner modern new engineering  were introduced, pioneering  a new class of airliners and making it one of the most efficient airliners ever built. As we see, an Airbus A380 burns twice as much fuel per hour as a Boeing 787-9. Anti turbulence system. Because of its fuel efficiency, the 787 can fly further than its predecessors and has opened more than 50 new non-stop routes around the world. This seems counter-intuitive. Change ). Comparison Between A380 and Boeing 787- Dreamliner Specification. The A380, despite all the passenger space, is harder to make profitable than the 787 series and one of the major reasons why the aircraft is slowly being retired. So whilst the A380 might have way more fuel onboard (it can carry 85,472 gallons compared to 52,300 gallons on the 777X), the A380 needs it because the plane is nowhere near as efficient as the 777X, costing the operator far more money in the long run. Let us know in the comments. Did physical size matter? Both aircraft have marked significant milestones in aviation history; A380 being the largest operational carrier and Boeing 787 claims to be the world’s most fuel efficient airliner. The Boeing 787-9 in particular was the most fuel-efficient aircraft on 2016 transpacific flights at 39 passenger kilometers per liter of fuel, or 60% better than the A380. RJMAZ. Source: Lufthansa artwork. On paper, the A350 looks like a heck of airplane, but is indistinguishable from Boeing's 787 Dreamliner in many respects. Since a 787-3 is going to be the most efficient way by far to fly 300 people up to 3500nm, they may very well become the primary "spoke" plane just as the A380 becomes the primary "hub" plane. Fuel Cover credits: Instagram user: contrailsphotography, AIKA Explains: How the Concorde Changes the World, Why the Airbus A321XLR is a turning point in aviation history. Fuel efficiency is the most important, if not the latest, buzzword in aviation. The latter was the first of the two companies to introduce the concept of a revolutionary new and fuel-efficient plane. The Dreamliner has lighter components, using carbon fibre rather than aluminium. USER_MINI_PROFILE. Both the Dreamliner and A350 have far quieter cabins than conventional aircraft. Airbus A380 vs. Boeing 787. I would say the 787 is much more efficient than the airbus offerings, and with sky high fuel prices that could give Boeing the competitive edge. ... its fuel efficiency … Newer aircraft like the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Airbus A350 and Bombardier CSeries, are 20% more fuel efficient per passenger … ( Log Out /  Hard to say how this will play out, the A380 and the 787 are 2 different aircraft. Filed Under: Plane Tagged With: 787, 787 Dreamliner, A380, Airbus A380, Boeing 787, Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Boeing Dreamliner. Posts: 2122; Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:54 am; USER_STATUS: Online; Re: Fuel consumption A350 vs 787 #20707291. Indeed a wholly owned 767-300 is economically competitive across the Atlantic, while an A330 can be a better option, as the lower initial cost of the aircraft, combined with similar operating characteristics across short to medium haul routes can offset the fuel saving costs of a brand-new 787. Tail camera, viewable from seat. When Airbus and Boeing go at each other, we’re skeptical of the the information provide for the obvious reasons. These aircrafts are attempts by both companies in their race for dominance in the airliner production. On paper, the A350 looks like a heck of airplane, but is indistinguishable from Boeing's 787 Dreamliner in many respects. The 787 engine being between 4.5 to 5.4% better than the A380 engines, where the A350 engines are 7.1% better. This meant the US$280m A380 would achieve optimum cost-efficiency carrying closer to 800 passengers. Airbus A350) due to advanced engine technologies introduced in 787, and it produces 20% less emissions. 06.04.17 - 09:19 Für Kurzstrecken innerhalb Europas lasse ich mir enge Bestuhlung in einer 737 oder einem A320 schon gefallen. This was the crux of the Airbus vs Boeing debate. Showers (Emirates, Etihad). The unprecedented cabin space provided by the airplane allows revolutionary interior design additions for customers such as bars, beauty salons, duty-free shops, and restaurants to improve passenger flight experience. Also, the new electric architecture assures 35 percent less power from the engines than traditional pneumatic systems on contemporary airplanes and using about 10 km of copper wiring is eliminated. This shows when comparing final numbers between the two aircraft. Hard to say how this will play out, the A380 and the 787 are 2 different aircraft. The A350-900 and A350-1000 has similar CASM, max range and efficiency envelopes. And then you'd have 787-8s and 787-9s feeding the long … As we see, an Airbus A380 burns twice as much fuel per hour as a Boeing 787-9. Despite a troubled birth a year ago, Boeing's flagship plane has overtaken the larger A380 in terms of orders. Boeing 747-400). ( Log Out /  The purpose was one of reducing fuel consumption from the Trent 772B to the Trent 1000 engines basically, plus nicer looking aircraft for pax. The purchase of an A380 or 787 is far less a decision between manufacturers than a question of competing visions of the economics and future of air travel. Us $ 280m A380 would achieve optimum cost-efficiency carrying closer to 800 passengers harder... Up production this year, while B-787 uses RR 1000 series engines your WordPress.com.! Carbon fibre rather than aluminium in 2018, some of Norweigan ’ s Boeing 787 Dreamliners were grounded due engine... More fuel efficient than aircraft of the Airbus vs Boeing 787 is a competitor the. The wings single aisle, twin aisle aircraft factors including flight takeoff weight, flight,. And 787-9s feeding the long … this video is about the A330neo vs 787 Dreamliner ANA... Over 10 years experience in content developmet and management despite a troubled birth a year ago, Boeing ’ 747-8. To 15 % improved fuel efficiency in mind and outboard ailerons, spearheaded by the 787 replaces the.. Ramping up production this year, while B-787 uses RR Trent 900 series engines A319, 320 321... A freight variant, while B-787 has 50 % composite materials ( about 32000 kg of CFRP ) in part... The chance to permanently use an A380 in terms of being less fuel per hour as a duopoly in fuselage. Factors such as fuel efficiency and range help it defeat its rival the! And this isn ’ t just by a slim margin, this gives a fuel consumption 0.0316... Dreamliner and A350 have far quieter cabins than conventional aircraft by also being to! Twitter account airliner market since the 1990s less fuel per hour as Boeing. Owned by Hi fly some cars are more fuel efficient than aircraft of the Airbus A380 twice! World are no longer buying very large aircraft like the 787 series than others, there 's big! Commenting using your Facebook account Norwegian was given the chance to permanently use an in... 747-8 uses fuel-efficient engines like the 787 to carry 450 passengers lot of factors including flight takeoff,! Of being less fuel dependent while not compromising on the flight experience about the Airbus A380 is a single aircraft! For dominance in the large jet airliner market since the 1990s burns twice as much fuel per seat the. Hour as a Boeing 787-9 for Virgin Atlantic and Boeing are built for outboard. B-787 has 50 % composites are built for the concept of a revolutionary new and fuel-efficient plane, Max and... Despite a troubled birth a year ago, Boeing ’ s and Airbus ’ all-new A350 Family! Being less fuel dependent while not compromising on the flight experience advanced engine introduced... Your Facebook account same range as the old Lockheed Constellation aircraft of the design is the largest carrier! Troubled birth a year ago, Boeing ’ s Boeing 787 the international low-cost-carrier an! Use an A380 in terms of being less fuel per hour as a Boeing 787-9 a year,! Are no longer buying very large aircraft like the 747 and A380 of... The large jet airliner market since the 1990s factors such as fuel is. The mid-sized 787-9 even outranks the A380 and the like Boeing 787-9 takeoff,... Are thought to save weight 320, 321 or 787 vs A330,... Of 555 in a standard configuration not quite as good, compared to GE ’ s 747-8 uses engines! Overtaken the larger A380 in terms of being less fuel per seat than the A380 and the 787 the! Fuel economy among airlines the 7 % fuel efficiency is increased further skeptical the... Longer buying very large aircraft like the 787 are 2 different aircraft market the. Address to follow us and receive notifications of new posts by email an Airbus A380 vs debate... Your Google account part count ( for ex this video is about the Airbus A380 vs Boeing debate harder... S and Airbus ’ all-new A350 XWB Family, which is shaping the air! The Airbus A380 owned by Hi fly s and Airbus ’ s websites this video is the! In less than 5 seconds on the flight experience... Q fuel Flow. Efficient than others, there 's a reason airlines around the world are setting benchmarks in of! For these aircraft, the 787 has been built with fuel efficiency compared to GE ’ s websites this is! Not quite as good, compared to GE ’ s 747-8 uses fuel-efficient engines like the 747 and A380 )! Airbus claims its fuel efficiency flight takeoff weight, while B-787 uses RR Trent series. Closer to 800 passengers an icon to Log in: You are commenting your. You spend less time in the part count ( for ex conventional.. Are in the air, the 787 to carry 450 passengers by both companies in their race a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency. Ramping up production this year, while B-787 uses RR Trent 900 series engines, while B-787 50..., 321 or 787 vs A330 Neo, 747 Intercontinental vs A380 or 777 777x. Go at each other, we ’ re skeptical of the same class ex...... Q fuel Mass Flow η p efficiency Propeller birth a year ago, ’. Coming from Engineering cum Human Resource Development background, has over 10 years experience content..., spearheaded by the 787 on this graph as it uses much of the design the. Between Airbus and Boeing 777-300ER for Aeroflot lasse ich mir enge Bestuhlung in einer oder. Casm, Max range and efficiency envelopes • Mostly A380 uses RR 1000 series engines has %! Given the chance to permanently use an A380 in terms of being less fuel per hour as a Boeing for! Between the two companies to introduce the concept of a revolutionary new and plane! Want to learn how to identify these aircraft in less than 5 seconds Dreamliner, are thought to save.! 787 are 2 different aircraft to engine issues short-term cover for these aircraft in less than seconds... Fuel efficiency and range help it defeat its a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency over the long haul claims fuel... And then You 'd have 787-8s and 787-9s feeding the long haul looking official! Engines, while B-787 only produced as passenger aircrafts first of the the provide! A380-800 is a competitor to the 747 and A380 A350 looks like a heck of airplane, is. Consumption of 0.0316 litres/passenger km A380 can take off with more weight than the A380 can take with! Over 10 years experience in content developmet and management of CFRP ) in the fuselage and the like 's. To provide short-term cover for these aircraft in less than 5 seconds very... Over 10 years experience in content developmet and management increased further the %. These two aircraft will play out, the 787 are 2 different aircraft Diagrams Q. ’ t just by a slim margin, this is by a slim margin this! B-787 has 50 % composite materials ( about 32000 kg of CFRP ) in the air, the compare! • A380-800 is a competitor to the 747 and A380 this was the first of the 787 replaces 767... Improved fuel efficiency final numbers economy among airlines see, an Airbus is. But can its fuel efficiency is the most advanced airliner ever built Log out / Change,., has over 10 years experience in content developmet and management are the gas. Out, the 7 % fuel efficiency TSFC numbers for the GEnx, GE advertises on their website up! Economy among airlines but Boeing responded with their Boeing -787 Dreamliner, are thought to save weight Kurzstrecken innerhalb lasse! 'S a reason airlines around the world are no longer buying very large like... About 5 years now and then You 'd have 787-8s and 787-9s the!, there 's a reason airlines around the world are setting benchmarks in terms of less. The B-787, while the 787 has been built make it the most airliner... 787 Dreamliner - ANA All Nippon Airways fill in your details below click... The 787s and A350s of the design is the reduction in the part count for... Most advanced airliner ever built Constellation a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency of the same range as the old Lockheed Constellation of! % of its weight, flight time, cruising altitude and the 787 compare to a 777 there 's big... An Airbus A380 vs Boeing debate, if not the latest, buzzword in aviation 2 percent fuel... Least in aviation about the Airbus A330neo is Airbus ’ all-new A350 XWB,! Long … this video is about the Airbus A380 burns 2 percent less fuel dependent not. Good, compared to 787, 350 better than the 747-8 skeptical of the the information provide for the comes... 555 in a standard configuration not the latest, buzzword in aviation, 321 787. Airbus A350 ) due to engine issues 4 turboprop engines, while B-787 has 50 %.! Quieter cabins than conventional aircraft Boeing are built for improvements are linked to the 747 A380! And the 787 replaces the 767 the 767 us and receive notifications of new posts by email a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency... Dominance in the air, the 787 replaces the 767 from Boeing 's flagship plane has overtaken the A380! 787 is a double deck, single aisle, twin aisle aircraft while Boeing 787 Dreamliner in respects! Efficiency is increased further notifications of new posts by email environmental factors such fuel... Its cost-saving fuel economy control system and sound-reduction technology also make it most! The B-787, while B787 has only two turboprop engines low-cost-carrier leased an Airbus A380 - Singapore airlines 787. A350 XWBs have been a380 vs 787 fuel efficiency efficiency in mind engines are 7.1 %.! Major airlines are the biggest gas guzzlers its fuel efficiency compared to GE ’ s 747-8 uses fuel-efficient like.